3 ttv'.-^J
H
■■
UA9TC *H • .
■ I
■H
H
■
r<:^
,.Ih\$- : ,
fa
■
■
*'■■■ H
■. ■ ■
v •
I
■ MM
• - ' - jy • « ■ •
Sj
1 1 ■
■ ■ I
^■ r i#w
< m
■
£Jn a^I';" ^^^H_
91 H
31
eh
■HaNUaC
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Board of Higher Education
Division of Immigration and Americanization
FIFTY ■ FIRST
ANNUAL REPORT
July 1, 1967-June 30, 1968
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Winthrop S. Dakin, Chairman
Amherst, Mass.
Bernard J. O'Keefe, Vice Chairman
Natick, Mass.
Dr. Gene P. Grille-
Louis M. Lyons
Patrick J. King
Roger L. Futnam, Sr.
Daniel C. Rich
Margaret Spengler
Frieda S. Ullian
Esther S. Yntema
James T. Curtis
Dr. Arthur Fitzgerald
- Bradford, Mass.
- Cambridge, Mass.
- Brighton, Mass.
- Petersham, Mass.
-Worcester, Mass.
- Arlington, Mass.
- Newton Center, Mass
- Cambridge, Mass.
- Lowell, Mass.
- Lexington, Mass.
Dr. Richard M. Millard, Chancellor
DIVISION OF IMMIGRATION AND AMERICANIZATION
MAIN OFFICE
BOSTON, MASS.
BRANCH OFFICES
FALL RIVER, MASS,
LAWRENCE, MASS.
Room 208, Tremont Building
73 Tremont Street
Telephone: 227-0718
Supervisor of Social Service
Teofilia K. Tattan
51 Franklin Street
Telephone: OSborne 2-7762
District Immigration Agent
Daniel J. Donahue
Room 308-9 Blakeley Building
kll Essex Street
Telephone: MUrdock 2-2877
District Immigration Agent
Andrew W. Ansara
SPRINGFIELD, MASS.
WORCESTER, MASS.
State Office Building
235 Chestnut Street
Telephone: REpublic It-1018
District Immigration Agent
John a. Mclnnes
Room 1|01-1±02, Park Building
507 Main Street
Telephone: PLeasant 5-6615
District Immigration Agent
Edmund B. Meduski
Publication?^ 70 Approved by Alfred C. Holland - State Purchasing Agent
". -- "■ ■-"--■ * ■ - — ,-
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2012 with funding from
Boston Public Library
■ '-*$&■
http://archive.org/details/annualreportofdi1968mass
REPORT OF THE
DIVISION OF MIGRATION AND AMERICANIZATION
FOR THE YEAR
JULY 1, 1967 TO JUNE 30, 1968
This summary will be the fifty-first report submitted by
this Division since it was established as the Bureau of Immigration
in 1917. From 1919 to 1965, as the Division of Immigration and
Americanization, it was under the Department of Education, With
the enactment of Chapter 572 in 1965, the Board of Higher Education
was given jurisdiction of this Division and its functions have been
the same - "bringing into sympathetic and mutually helpful relations
the Commonwealth and its residents of foreign origin".
Massachusetts with its increased population now of 5»^ million
ranks tenth among the States. It is seventh with number of aliens
and records at forty per cent its population of foreign origin.
(The Bureau of Census defines foreign origin either those born
abroad or those who have parents foreign born.) Boston is rated
as a city with fifty per cent population of persons with foreign
background, with its large foreign born population and those having
foreign born parents and also because of the large number of foreign
students studying at its many educational institutions.
OUR SERVICES
The charts at the end of this report detail the 1*7,297
services given by the five offices of this Division in the many
problems of assimilation, reuniting families, citizenship assistance,
as well as the many phases of immigration problem assistance given
to some 19,000 individuals this year. A notable increase is noted
for Boston - 2,578 more than last year. Services recorded are:
Boston, 26,562] Fall River, U,171] Lawrence, 7,021] Springfield, 3,937.
and Worcester, 5,606.
NATIONALITIES OF CLIENTS
Of the some one hundred eight countries of birth, as we record
nationalities . of the applicants, services were given Italian born,
5,382 (3,196 in Boston) 1 Portuguese (includes Cape Verde Islands)
U,625 (of which Fall River had 2,825) | Canada 14,121] Cuba, 3,938]
United States born, 3,513] Greece, 2,903] Poland, 2,1*72] Ireland,
1,635] Jamaica, 1,371] German, 1,306] and China, 1,077 with others
less than 1,000 and showing increases in numbers, especially in
countries of Latin America and from the West Indies.
ALIENS IN MASSACHUSETTS
•
The Federal annual registry of aliens for January 1°68
shows 3,876,301*. aliens registering as required with 1*71,127
of these other than permanent residents of the United States,
With increase of population since I960 census, Massachusetts ,
tenth in population count, is seventh with its ll*9, 651* aliens
and shows an increase of 5,000 over the number of last year ! s
registrants. The list of States with the largest number of
aliens for 1968:
Other than
Permanent Permanent
1968 Residents Residents
California
923,11*5
858,671*
61*, 1*71
New York
708,823
629,01*2
79,781
Illinois
252,516
225,021
27,521*
Texas
2l*2,02l*
230, 9h6
11,078
Florida
2l*l,08l
11*9,810
91,271
New Jersey
208,222
175,11*3
33,077
Massachusettsll*9,651*
136,632
13,C02
Michigan
114;, 2 72
132,1*82
3,853
Pennsylvania
• 10U,7i4l
93,387
11,351*
FROM WHENCE THEY COME
This year for the first time, in the foreign speaking
group, those from Portugal, recorded at 22,579, form the
largest group, showing an increase of some 1*,000 over last year
and attesting to the benefits of the Immigration Act permitting
reunion of families ; Italians next largest with ll*,922 recorded,
about 1,000 more than last year. The following chart records
countries of birth of the 136,632 permanent resident aliens
in Massachusetts:
TOTAL ALIENS 136,632
Europe 85, 88l
Albania
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Czechoslovakia
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
561
288
1*1
1U7
258
28
872
1,382
1*,602
5,026
333
5,U66
11*, 922
575
1,89U
11
.
Netherlands 1,273
Norway '— - 526
Poland • 7,850
Portugal 22,579
Rumania 150
Spain 318
Sweden 81*9
Switzerland i|01
Turkey .' .627
United Kingdom 12,711
U. S. S. R. i,5oo
Yugoslavia 175
Other Europe ... ' kh
Asi a __ 6,091
China - 2,900
India Ut9
Indonesia 32
Iran 156
Iraq 32
Israel 388
Japan 521
Jordan 112
Korea 286
Lebanon SSS
Pakistan kO
Palestine 11
Philippines 35^
Other Asia 353
North America 39,0U6
Canada " 33,673
Mexico 253
Barbados 169
Cuba 2,259
Dominican Republic 327
Haiti 371
Jamaica 625
Trinidad & Tobago 1U6
Costa Rica 316
El Salvador 1;0
Guatemala 196
Honduras 388
Nicaragua 28
Panama 255
South America
2,981
Argentina
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Ecuador
Peru
Venezuela
Other South America
Africa
602
768
108
770
201;
195
176
158
507
Morocco
South Africa
Tunisia
17
159
12
U, A. R. (Egypt)
Other Africa
Oceania
238
81
399
Australia
New Zealand
Other Oceania
3
Stateless
306
3*
867
All Other
860
RECENT ARRIVALS
In the past ten years 126,61+7 immigrants gave Massachusetts
as their destination. The latest official federal report
completed as of June 30, 1967 records that 18,21*6 came to
Massachusetts in that year. NQ official record is yet
available for 1968 but that figure will be exceeded for
1968, I believe. The report of their countries of birth
for 1967 is j
Italy
1,807
United Kingdom
1,708
Canada
1,553
Greece
1,29U
China
697
Cuba
562
Germany
U32
Poland
291
Denmark, Norway & Sweden
France
225
126
Colombia
10U
Philippines
Japan
Haiti
102
92
78
Dominican Republic
Ecuador, Mexico & Yugoslavia
All Other
51
U6
8,936 etc.
We note from the alien registration the large Portuguese
group but apparently this report groups the Portuguese in
the "All Other" category. From the records, showing new
arrivals, which we receive from the Federal office to
circularize for educational opportunities, it is interesting
to note what persons of various nationalities give as their
destination, tending to go to cities where live large groups
of the same ethnic background. Most of the Portuguese go
to New Bedford] Italians in large numbers to the North
End of Boston; a great number of West Indian domestics
destined to Suburbia. At least twenty-five per cent change
their address within months of arrival, as attested by
return of welcome letters we send all immigrants.
PROBLEMS OF THE NEWCOMER
We send a letter to the newly arrived immigrant,
offering the services of our offices • The replies come
with requests for information on educational opportunities,
especially learning English. Many inquire about accelerated
courses for English, as well as evening courses in trades
and technical subjects. Translations of diplomas and
school credits, job opportunities, drivers 1 licenses,
addresses to register for the draft, as well as the change
of address forms AR-11, non-receipt of alien registration
cards, information on immigration, reunion with relatives
left abroad, or when citizenship may be obtained are
usual inquiries.
Three thousand sixty newcomers received assistance
last year. Many of the Portuguese immigrants were married
men vjho came alone, finally getting their visas after
a long wait in the quota. Many had families left behind
and it has not been unusual to make as many as eight
petitions for one applicant. Often a close relative
assists this new immigrant in joining as sponsor by
making the additional affidavit of support.
Many neitfly arrived Italian parents of a citizen
child in the United States leave behind unmarried adult
sons and daughters. They come to the office a week
after arrival into the United States to initiate action
in making the necessary petitions.
IMMIGRATION PROBLEMS
Information on bringing friends and relatives and on procedures
is asked many times. Cur services cover answering questions on the
quota to writing appeals to the Board of Immigration Appeals on
changes of status applications perhaps. Since enactment of the
Immigration Law of October 1965 regarding need of labor clearances,
many an aunt desiring to "sponsor" her niece in Iteland with an
affidavit of support has been disappointed at the requirement for
promise of a job and the necessary approval of the Labor Department,
We gave information and forms for employers to fill. Domestic
applications lessened when, in the latter part of the year, the
higher wage scale was required. Many of the relatives having
abroad cousins or uncles, etc., for whom no relative petitions
could be made, assisted their relatives by getting employers who
could employ such skilled labor to make the necessary assurances
of employment. We have assisted many in translation of education
evidence and of work experience to accompany applications sent
for approval to the Federal authorities. Many x^rere applications
for tailors, stone masons, mechanics, etc., where a shortage of
such labor had been established.
Petitions to create immediate family relationship are still
most numerous and our report shows that 1,338 such petitions
were made. At first, a sister, brother, or spouse of a person in
Ireland or Great Britain had to be convinced that a petition was
required with the necessary personal documentation to prove
relationship, followed by the affidavit of support, etc. The
newly arrived immigrant parent itfith an unmarried child abroad is
usually quick to start procedure and often brings with him the
necessary documents on his initial appearance at the office.
Many of the brothers and sisters in Portugal, Greece, China,
Lebanon, etc., having waited long for their turns in the quota,
now were able to get their turns and come to the United States •
We assisted many of the "domestics" arriving from the West Indies
in making necessary papers to be reunited with their husbands
and children.
CHANGE OF STATUS
Eight hundred thirty-one persons were assisted in completing
their applications for permanent residence. Many were from
Central America, South America, and the Dominican Republic. They
had come to the United States as visitors and had married citizens
of the United States. Anxious to remain here, they could not
adjust under Section 2U5 by application at the Federal Office
and remaining in the United States, but American Consuls in nearby
Canada could process their applications now that they were spouses
of United States citizens. The necessary forms and procedures
were completed and, although it took a number of months and anxious
T^aiting by the spouse, appointments were arranged and the trip to
Canada meant a one-day stay and return as a resident of the United
States. Several of these change of status cases involved young
men desiring to enter the armed services of the United States,
Tiro South American, a West Indian," and two- 1 Canadian young' men,
also one Canadian born girl, visitors in the United States,
procured such evidence of acceptance into military service
and the Consul accepted this in lieu of a labor clearance.
Applications were processed and, since the persons were from
nonquota countries, appointments for issuance of visas were
arranged expeditiously.
Others were immediate relative visitors in this country who
had decided to try to stay in the United States — as a parent of
a citizen ora sister or brother from a country where approval of
the petition made available the quota number. The necessary
forms, translations, if so required, were executed and applications
filed with the Federal Service. Our bilingual social workers
accompanied many of the applicants to hearings in their behalf.
We represented clients in 220 such cases.
There is no doubt that labor clearance requirements
made it more difficult to get visas for the nonquota country
applicants and for those from countries where nonpreference
numbers had been available. . Under the previous law, about
seventy per cent of the nonpreference numbers were available
for the people of Great Britain, Ireland, and Germany. There
have been protest bills introduced in behalf of persons of
these nationalities, as wsll as other laws introduced by
many senators and congressmen to make changes in the legislation.
Some recommend preferences in quota for parents of aliens j others
would make quota numbers available to brothers and sisters of
Italian birth who still await their turns in the quota after
twelve years) as- well as suggested changes in labor clearance
requirements •
On July 1, 1968 when the ceiling of 120.000 for the Western
Hemisphere becomes effective, it is predicted that for many of
our applicants with Canadian relatives, spouses of legal
resident Jamaicans or other nationals of the Western Hemisphere,
there will be a waiting list for their turn in the quota.
CUBANS
The many Cubans in this Commonwealth we continue to
assist in applications for adjustment to residents, initiating
1±38 such actions in 1°68. Our Spanish worker was kept very
busy in translating the necessary birth, marriage, determination
of marriage records to accompany the applications. The Cubans
became aware of the impending July first legislation when it
might be that they would be included in the 120,000 Western
Hemisphere quota applicants and applicants in the months of
April through June were more numerous.
Many of the relatives continue to seek our assistance in
making necessary letters, applications, and affidavits of
support for their relatives to come to the United States via Mexico.
Having become discouraged waiting for their relatives to come
on the regular airlift via the Refugee Center in Miami, they are
most anxious to try any procedure. Among those who have reached
Mexico, even the requirement of a sister or brother coining to
the United States for the labor clearance has been surmounted.
A number of Cubans have applied for citizenship now that
they had the necessary five years of permanent residence!!!
CITIZENSHIP AND NATURALIZATION
United States citizenship is a prized privilege, as attested
by many inquiries regarding loss of citizenship by living abroad,
as well as many newcomers' barely complying with the necessary
five year requirement. ¥e assisted 1,783 persons in our
offices in initiating their applications for naturalization.
In this State last year, U>l66 persons were naturalized. With
the conveniently available evening classes for English and
Citizenship in this State, it has been an incentive for the
newcomer to apply for citizenship as soon as possible after
the necessary residence period, as he is better qualified.
Cur booklet, "Questions and Answers in Preparation for
Naturalization Examination" is given to each applicant we assist
in filling the application. We print some 10,000 booklets
yearly for distribution to public school classes, civic groups, etc.
The requirement to present proof of citizenship derived
through parentage or marriage necessitated assistance for 313
persons in making applications for derivative citizenship. .
For some of the applicants, it x>ras easy to get the necessary
birth, marriage, and naturalization data required. In a few
of the cases where citizenship was gained through a grandparent,
it meant much correspondence and ferreting out old birth and
residence records. Usually in an election year, the requirement
for registration to vote has made it necessary, in many cases,
to furnish such proof.
Only one change in the naturalization laws was passed
in 1968. This affects widows of servicemen x-7ho may be naturalized
under eased regulations without the required period of
residence.
Legislation introduced for Vietnam War Veterans may be
soon enacted but easing of requirements of complying with
necessary examination, as for elderly persons, etc., has
received no action.
PENDING L EGISLATION
.
There are several bills pending, advocating changes in
the immigration laws... some to make numbers in the quota
available if petitions were approved prior to July 1, 1968j some
to make numbers available for certain countries; another to help
' , ■
those in skilled labor preferential quotas, as well as to grant
nonquota standing to certain close relatives, etc. as usual,
the bills are many and varied and predict further assistance
we may be required to give our Massachusetts residents.
COOPERATION 1 T ITH OTHER AGENCIES
The Division has enjoyed constant cooperation of the _
district director of the U. S. Immigration and Naturalization
Service. We have also had pleasantly cooperative relationships
with the social agencies in Boston which engage in technical
immigration and citizenship work. YJe have given consultative
service to other social agencies on occasional problems concerning
their clients of foreign origin.
SPRINGFIELD OFFICE
During the fiscal year ending June 30, 1968, 3,937 services
were performed for 2,l6l individuals by the Springfield District
0ffi.ce for residents of this area.
Individuals came to us from fifty-one localities in the
Commonwealth. In addition, we received correspondence from
sixty-three former residents who now live in other parts ol
the United States.
Of the seventy-six nationalities recorded, natives of
Canada were the largest group, followed in turn by natives of
rfche United States, Jamaica, Italy, Germany, Greece, Poland, Great
Britein, Ireland, and Portugal.
During the year, we contacted by mail 7U6 newly arrived
immigrants who came to reside in Berkshire, Franklin, Hampden and
Hampshire Counties. Subsequently we heard from many of them,
reporting changes of address, filing annual address reports,
inquiring about registering for Selective Service and about
possibility of sponsoring relatives who wish to come to this
countrv. A small percentage of them employed as. domestics
sought" oar assistance and guidance regarding problems that have
arisen with their employers .
Again this year, the major part of our work came under
the classification of immigration. The need for labor clearance
still creates insurmountable problems for some of our clients,
especially when their relatives are unskilled.
In connection with adjustment of status cases, we handled
several for whom we were able to make the necessary arrangements
to go to the American Consulate at Saint John, New Brunswick.
Only one of these cases was unsuccessful and that was in reference
to a young man born in Ecuador whose application was accepted but
he was finally notified that the consul could no longer process
the application because the American Consular Office in Ecuador
requested that the young man be instructed to return there to
make his formal application. It should be noted here that we
have received prompt and full cooperation from the Consul at
Saint John, Canada, as well as those whom we contact abroad.
Another of our adjustment cases concerned a lady born in
Haiti in 1927 xiiocame to the United States in 1935. When she
first came to us, she stated that she was a citizen of the
United States because her mother was born in the State of Florida.
It later developed that her mother had not been born in the
United States. When client attempted to apply for naturalization,
it was discovered that she entered the United States illegally
so, therefore, she was required to apply to have a record of her
lawful entry created under Section 2U9 as amended. To further
add to the problems of this individual, it was discovered that
she had been married to an alien born in the Western Hemisphere
who recently entered the United States illegally. We are now
working on his case, trying to arrange for him to obtain an
immigrant visa in Canada.
Although applications for naturalization have decreased,
preparation of an application is more time-consuming. Of the
several applications handled for gentlemen born abroad and at
present serving in the United States Air Force, there was one
that was most rewarding j it concerned a veteran of the Vietnam
conflict who recently returned to the United States. Another
case of a Vietnam veteran concerned his desire to have his
adopted children become citizens. They were both born in South
Vietnam and viere adopted by him while he was serving there with
the United States Air Force.
Again this past year we corresponded with both the United
States State Department and the United States Immigration and
Naturalization Service in cases of adjustment of citizenship
status of ladies who benefited by the United States Supreme Court
Decision of Kay 29> 1967 in the case of Afroyim v. Rusk .
While attending one of the final hearings for naturalization
at our local court, this agent x^ras both surprised and honored when
the presiding justice called his name and that of the United
States Naturalization Examiner, instructing them both to rise and,
in the presence of all, extended his thanks for their assistance
to the court and to the new citizens.
We continue to enjoy excellent contacts and cooperation from
private and socal agencies in our area, city and town clerks,
registrars of voters, clerks of courts and teachers in Adult
Education, and particularly would express our appreciation to
both the Springfield and Boston Offices of the United States Immi-
gration and Naturalization Service for their cooperation and
assistance.
WORCESTER OFFICE
This District Office assisted 3,3U6 individuals with £,606
services. This branch office of the Division, comprising an Agent
and a Clerk, again had a substantial amount of services, due to
the fact that Worcester County is the largest in area in Massa-
chusetts, being bigger than Rhode Island and bordering three
States. It measures about kO miles from side to side and 50
miles from head to foot. It contains 60 cities and towns, each
with its own government, its own history, its own characteristics
in terms of geography, economy, and general way of life influenced
by different nationality and ethnic groups derived from immigrants
dating back to the Pilgrims to the ones of the present day.
For example, the town of Hardwick was purchased from the Indians j
the town common of Holden once belonged to John Hancock; and not
that we would be facetious, George Washington really did sleep
in Mendon.
New immigrants who arrived during the year, sponsored by
friends or relatives, are warmly welcomed by them and by the
ethnic groups comprised of previous immigrants and first, second,
and even third generation Americans predominating in these
localities. Our office has also assisted and advised industry,
business and affluent residents with forms and government
procedure to obtain vitally needed personnel such as professional,
technical, skilled, unskilled, and even domestic help from
overseas, that cannot be obtained locally, and were so certified
by the Massachusetts Division of Employment Security. A
leisurely drive through the central part of the State, as one
observes names, architecture, commercial enterprises, and ways
of life, makes these facts evident.
Incidentally, we assisted with citizenship the Turkish born
wife of a Worcester man, under Section 319(b) of the law, as spouse
of a United States citizen employed by a U. S. concern. He is a
construction supervisor with a United States company that, with
native help, is constructing schools, churches and other public
buildings in countries overseas which never had these facilities,
also by this, fostering the American way of life and ideals there.
We also get involved with the increased travel boom and
increased issuance of United States passports from the Clerk
of Courts' Office, Worcester, to local residents. One man whom
they advised on a derivative certificate before issuance of
a passport phoned our office and still in an angry tone did not
see the necessity of it because he is a citizen desiring to
travel next month. After our discussing the matter with him,
he became more agreeable, especially after our offering to
complete the N-600 form, trying to expedite the matter, and
advising on necessary documentation.
Americanization is one phase of our work - the other,
Immigration which has been more complex for the past few years
due to beneficial changes in the quota system by Congress, and
another revision being effective on July 1, 1°68 which we explain
daily to our clients native to this locality and to others from
many sections of the world. Regulations, forms, and procedure
concerning seven preferences and nonpreference for quota numbers
for the Eastern Hemisphere, and 120,000 annual limitation
prescribed in Section 21(e) of the Act of October 3, 1965 for
the Western Hemisphere may be cause for perplexity for persons
not in this realm of endeavors.
LAUREKCE OFFICE
The number of persons served by the Lawrence District Office
totalled 2,831 for the past fiscal year. Although the 7,021
services and total persons served are less, somewhat, from last
year's all-time high, it seems that this past year we were the
busiest we have ever been. This can be attributed - in part - to
the fact that many changes in the immigration laws necessitated
our giving detailed explanations and interpretations of the
new regulations.
When the law was passed in 1965, we had high hopes that
many families x-jere to be reunited. This was true for a while.
Now, however, it seems that a bottleneck has developed and
we are having to give many, many persons the disappointing news
that it appears it x-jill be some time before their relatives
will be able to come to this country. It is hoped that the next
Congress will see fit to pass alleviating legislation, easing
present resiErictions.
Again, as in the past years, the bulk of our work dealt
with immigration matters. Petitions, affidavits of support,
and changes of status, especially for Cuban refugees, were high
on the list of services rendered. In Lawrence, particularly,
there has been a large influx of persons from the Dominican
Republic. It is interesting to note how individuals from
certain countries will select a particular community in which
to settle. For example, there is now a large Dominican community
in Lawrence. Lox^ell, practically a twin city of Lawrence, has
a negligible number of Dominicans. These cities are very similar
and less than ten miles apart.
We had many routine cases requiring assistance. One of the
unusual ones involved a man from a Communist country who came to
the United States as a visitor. A highly skilled electronics
technician, he was trained in his work by his government. During
his stay in the United States, he received an excellent offer of
a very responsible position with an electronics firm. We explained
the procedure for a change of status and assisted both him and
the employer in completing the necessary forms. The man was
extremely well -qualified and all the papers were approved.
Because, however, no visa number xtfas available for a person in
this man's category, the U. S. Immigration and Naturalization
Service x^as obliged to reject his application and gave him
thirty days to leave the country. Meanwhile, the man received
correspondence from relatives in his homeland informing him
that, because he did not return when he should have, he is now
considered a fugitive. He was tried "in absentia", found guilty,
and sentenced to three years at hard labor. His relatives warned
him that he would be arrested as soon as he set foot in his
country.
There being no other recourse, after interview of relatives
and friends, a Congressman introduced a Private Bill in his
behalf. The man, still in the United States, is contributing
his expert knowledge to a vital facet of our electronics industry.
The United States Immigration officials have assured they will
give him every consideration as soon as a visa number becomes
available for his use.
We are particularly concerned with helping tnose many
persons who wish to become naturalized. One hundred forty-
three applicants were assisted in filling citizenship forms.
This agent attends all the naturalization sessions in Lowell
and Lawrence and makes special effort to congratulate each
of the new citizens, many of whom he had helped to initiate
the action.
Additional services included making a number of
translations of documents from French, German, Arabic, Latin,
and Italian. We sent letters welcoming all newcomers to our
area. We assisted both employers and prospective employees
in completion of labor clearance applications. American citizens
were assisted in completion of applications for United States
passports. Newcomers having problems dealing with matters
other than immigration or citizenship x^ere referred to the
proper resources.
The news media in Lox^ell and Lawrence were most cooperative
in publicizing whatever news releases we gave them. We have
continued to maintain cordial relations with public and
private agencies both in this country and overseas to our
mutual benefit.
Althqugh many evenings we go home "dog-tired", our sense
of accomplishment somehow lifts up our spirits and we feel that
our efforts are worth while.
FALL RIVER OFFICE
'with the close of the fiscal year, June 30, 1968, the
total statistical count remains fairly consistent at i;,171
for the entire year and 2,U09 individuals were assisted in
their problems. These figures do not r ecord other services
rendered, such as telephone inquiries or the newcomer letters
sent to all new immigrant arrivals in the Southeastern Massachusetts
area.
The Immigration Act of October 3 > 1965 has eased immigration
barriers for the predominantly large Portuguese ethnic, group whose
roots and ties are concentrated in this area. There have been
thousands of newly arrived located in this area during the past
fiscal year, so much so, that it required reopening of unused, old
schools to take care of the children's needs. The new influx of immi-
grants did not come about overnight. It has been the backlog of old
visa petitions completed by members of the immediate families and a
large portion of these visa petitions was completed at this office.
Beneficiaries of these petitions are Slow entitled to bring their entire
family units, hence the large influx of new immigrants gained by the
unused quota pools which took effect October 3, 1965- This quota pool
represents unused visas from countries having large quotas. They are
placed in a pool and distributed to nations with small quotas and
backlogs of intending immigrants awaiting their turn to enter the
United States, This immigration will increase during the next fiscal
year and numerous inquiries by the press and radio have been made
regarding the magnitude of newcomers, so much so that many stories of
interest have been written in local newspapers and in others
throughout Southeastern Massachusetts,
Regarding citizenship services at this Branch Office during the
past fiscal year, the count is approximately consistent with that of
the previous year • One hundred ninety-four petitions for naturalization
were completed by persons applying in their own behalf and parents
petitioning in behalf of minor children. Twenty-five persons applied
for their own certificates of citizenship. Election year reminds those
eligible to apply for United States citizenship and it is anticipated
that the coming year will bring an increase in naturalization.
This Branch Office has made numerous appeals to the Board of Review,
Department of State, Washington, D, C, regarding Certificates of Loss
of Nationality in behalf of native-born United States, citizens of
Portuguese ancestry. In all cases, the clients Were born in the
United States and taken to Portugal at a tender age. During World ¥ar
II, the Portuguese Army inducted these United States citizens into the
armed forces of Portugal whereby under the Immigration and Nationality
Act of 19h0 they were considered to have lost U. S. nationality. Using
the United States Supreme Court decision of . Nishikawa v, Dulles, this
Agent was successful in assistance and the Department of State ruled
that these clients did not lose the nationality of the United States,
This Agent was one of the principal speakers at the Regional
Conference of the Massachusetts Department of Education held at
Falmouth, Massachusetts, December lU, 1967 9 fit which educators,
clergy, and congressional staff members were also on the speakers ' list.
This Branch Office also deals with public and private agencies
throughout the District j with Federal Immigration and Naturalization
Service and American Consuls of the Department of State ; and there
has been a fine spirit of cooperatin between this office and the
aforementioned agencies.
For the Fiscal Year 7/1/67-6/30/68
INFORMATION
3
o
Eh
o
STA M ISTICAL
Booklet^ Forms, Blanks
Citizenship
Immigr atio n
Travel
Other ' " ~"
i Services
5968
FORMS FILLED
Change of Address (AR-11)
Consulate Biographic Form (DSP-70)~
Visa Registration (FS-U97 and U97AJ
Imm. Visa Application (FS-510)
Notice as Representative (G-28)~
Annual Address Report (1-53)
Lost Alien Reg. Card (1-90)
Visa Petition-Temp. Help (I-129B)
Visa Petition-Close Relative (l-136T~
Reentry Permit (1-131) .
Skilled Worker Petition (I-lU0) ~~
Permission Ret. to Domicile (1-191)
Permit to Return aft. Deport. (1-2127
Removal to Native Country (I-2U3) '
Suspension of Deportation (I-256A)
Notice of Filing Brief (I -2 SOB)
Foreign Police Clearance (l-li81i.)^
836
271
I5£?
105
191
i7U8
211;
177
160
T5F
"22T
~2&
3
8U3
182
^
3
fe
en!
>
H
DETAIL
■ w
Given
1680
k8l
W
1ST
13
32
783
13
1
1
W
TFT
.20
132
11U
1
"5"
Registry Form to make Record (I-U85)
Perm. Residence Application (l-l±85)
Change Status to Student (1-506)
35
10
U36
Extension of time for Visitor (1-539) 38H
Legal Residence Information sent
to Consuls (1-550) ^__^__ t ___
Petition under Orphans Act (1-600)
Waiver of Excludability (1-601
Waiver under Exchange Act ( 1-612)
Other Immigration Forms
Declaration of Intention (N-300)
Petition for Naturalization (N-UOOj"
Repatriation of American Born
Citizen (N-U01)
Petition for Nat'l of Child (N-U02)
Certification of Military or Naval
Service JN-1±26)
Duplicate Nat'l Certificate (N-565)__
Proof of Citizenship for us
Abroad (N-577)
Verification of Arrival (N-585)
Derivative Citizenship Cert. (N-600)
Other Naturalization Forms
318
~2?
13
5
38
76
T5TT
7
1
38
W
2
35"
13
2
w
38
W
3
"96"
158
3
2876
"ilf
315"
1922
188
10]
1595
69
23
36
w
3
1U2
Q
l
a
M
cc; jxj
Ph R
CO &4
2306
311
880
178
58
735
72
T
9
T
77
65^
81
33
73
3
1
1
T35"
57
Ji
172
22
5
3
25
139
19
h
3
20
1
IT
32
19
5
162
T
12
13
21
5
23
12
TG
3367
TH7H
3
3
23
221
"~5o
IIaD
35
22
75
17
1
Jl
13
173
T5
U
W
207
22u
206
336
TTcii'
u33
1,338
276
231
1
11
2
3
II
13
159
37
5U8
"TH"
121
103
1,699
ZK
12T
8
llq
313
1
EXECUTION OF AFFIDAVITS
Affidavit of Support ""
Affidavit of Facts
Certificate of Identity
U.S.S.R. Exit Permit *
Polish Assurance
Other Notarial
Cuban Adjustment (I-1+85A) ""
Biographic Information(G325)
(G325A)
Labor Clearance (ES-575A and Bj
Cuban Assurance
OTHER SERVICES
Change of Status (Cards)
Appearance at Hearings
Interpretation & Trans
Letters ~"
Other
B
Eh
CO
O
k6&
1820
If
7c"
358
1578
299
8ii20
627
U^TERVIEI-J ^(yCCMERS)
TOTALS
200_
iu29
"cloT
1771
26,562
erf
l-H- „
Ptl erf
U67
88
10
120
23;
13
565
h6
13
5
W
676
11,171
i
hh 1 Crf
801.
286
~5F
25
137
~6o"
231
1589
82
219
1031
2?f
157
7,021
i
erf ^
CO Cm
207
"9c"
13
erf.
m
Crf CO
O W
13 o
568
236
"15"
3
"oT
18
359
38
7
HIT
330
3,937
10
39"
11
178
10
tth
38
122
387
186
5,606
CO
En
O
EH
6,701
2,526
151
1
"61
lii8
"Bo?
"SB
2,238
3lU
17
11,U87
831
220
1,782
310
3,060
JtL>297
ALL OFFICES
ETHNIC AND
NATIONALITY STATISTICS
WOR-
CESTER
7/1/67-6/30/68
' BOSTON
FALL
LAW-
SPRING-
FIELD
RIVER
REKCE
TOTAL
1 • Albania
57
~
1
120
178
2 • Algeria
1
-
—
mm
4
i
■""
3 » Antigua
30
-
-
—
—
30
k. Argentina
272
k
U5
7
32_[
360
5. Armenia (R. or T.)
12
—
37
2
■1 1 m
J, -.0
lug
6, Australia
3k
2
7
1
■*i
/.;o
7 • Austria
87
10
b
12
■ -"■ „
1 rs-S
8 „ Bahamas
39
-
—
-
r-»
9. Barbados
329
mm
-
62
- 1 ?-
ns5
10 . Belgium
k9
U
9
29
£?
fLo
11 • Eermda
21
%
—
2
. 5S
#r
12. Bolivia
20
1
—
-
*■**»
27
13. Bras.il
H7
19
aS
2
10
156
Ik* Br. Guiana
33
-
8
*^
3
I£
15. Bulgaria
20
—
-
1
U
25
16. Canada
1952
101
1069
U95
50U
^21
17. Ceylon
h
—
—
-
-
u
18. Chile
U6
1
5
.
10
62
19. China
792
111*
27
30
82
1077
20. Colombia
350
2
17
20
96
m
21 • Congo
—
—
3
-
-
3
22. Costa Rica
301
-
20
7
5
333
23 . Cuba
2552
5
1080
97
20it
3938
2U. Cyprus
—
-
10
—
•■*
10
25. Czechoslovakia
kS
2
29
13
89
26. Danzig
k
—
—
-
-
k
27 • Denmark
20
k
18
11
5
58
2ti, Dominican Republic
227
—
380
2
11
620
29. Ecuador
205
X
137
66
3
M3
30. Egypt
127
11
52"
2
17
209
31. El Salvador
32
—
—
•^
-
32
32 ♦ England
^35
a
10U
206
132
933
33 • Estonia
9
—
_
10
1
20
3k* Finland
U8
m»
—
1
33
82
35. Formosa
12
—
—
22
-
3k
36. France
17ii
32
136
51
79
U72
37. Germany
520
67
21*5
269
205
1306
38. Ghana
11
*■*
—
3
1U
39. Greece
1U78
33
7U9
22U
i U19
I 2903
kO . Guatemala
330
2
28"
1
I
365
U1 . Haiti
535
, —
20
3
k
" 562
U2 • Honduras
U75
— .
6
5
h
U90
U3. Hong Kong
26
13
8
—
9
56
kk* Hungary
132
6
55
2I4
30
2U7
U5. Iceland
-
—
~
—
li
k "
I46 • India
122
15
Ui
26
75
282
kl • Indonesia
23
_
19
29
11
' 82 _
U8. Iran
' 68
—
8
2
3
81
U9. Lraq_
15
—
9
5
3
32
50. Ireland
13C0
11
ft
1U1
129
" 1635
51. Israel
70
—
k
9
11
9k
52. Italy
3196
3^
9U8
281
922
' 5382
.
SPRING-
FIELD. -
- WOR-
CESTER
BOSTON
FALL LA¥-
RIVER RENCE
TOTAL
1
S3* Jamaica 1102
„
5
as
U6
1571
5U. Japan
75
3
9
65
22
17U
55 • Jordan
■ 37
-
b
26
k
75
56 • Kenya
15
—
—
mm
-
"TT
57 . Korea
75
5~
17
k3
32
172
58. Latvia
127
7
5
5
12
156
5?. Lebanon
12k
8
395
32
61
620
60, Liberia
20
—
—
-
'
20
6l . Libya
9
-
-
-
'■ **
9
62 • Lithuania
313
k
23
7
•89
U36
63. Macau
6
*.
—
■«*
-
6
6/4.. Malaya
1
. —
-
—
-
1
65. Malta
7
¥^
-
-
7
66. Mexico
177
2
13
k
Ik
210
07 , Montserrat
255
_
■ —
-
255
68. Morocco
Ui
3
23
3
1
Ik
69. Netherlands
83
it
21
lii
hi
179
70. New Zealand
12
—
2
2
16
71 • Nicaragua
56
•■
—
-
56
72. Norway
k2
61
—
2
16
125
73. Other Countries
118
3
—
27
15
163
Ik* Pakistan
29
*"
IW
1
1F
kk
75 • Palestine
2k
U7
11
1
83
76 « Panama
117
10
5
21
k
157
77. Paraguay
9
MM
~
h
-
13
78. Peru
126
—
-
19
1
1U6
79. Philippines
m
89
u
26
39
i99
80. Poland
1308
103
288
215
558
2U72
81. Portugal
1388
2825
2U3
132
37
KS26
82. Puerto Rico
10
HV
2
-
1
13
83 • Rumania
60
6
1
11
k3
121
81* , Scotland
175
2
25
UI
I16
289
85. South Africa
27
tt
M
■ 2
•
33
86, Spain
1li0
9
17
1b
1b
202
87. St. Lucia
19
-
- — ',"
1
-
20
88. Sweden
ko T
a
7
15
k3
109
89. Switzerland
90
-
12
a
6
112
90. Syria
105
2 72
15
25
219
91 • Thailand
32 j
-
1
2
1
36
92. Trinidad
k62
2
MM
TUT
6
hSTT
93. Turkey
27o"
66
19
~8B~
""CU9
9k* Ukraine
U2
-•"•
■pri ■•
6
- j
JU8
9S* U.S.S.R.
"23T"
11
19
21
ko
326Sj
96. United State's
1623
269
292
55T
806
3563
* 97. Uruguay
kk
'_' ■■
-
1
k$
98 . Venezuela
19
7
ft
26
i 66
99* Vietnam
7
3
5
2
k
21
100. Wales
fh
-
5
1
5
25
101. West Indies (other)
1U7
1
—
18
3
169"
102. Yugoslavia
98 .
-
22
32
152
TOTALS
2656" 2
- ijlTl
7021
3937
5606
U7,29y
BOSTON
- 6/30/68
22
FALL
RIVER
L C A :
LAWRENCE
, I T I E S
I
SPRING-
FIELD WORCESTER
A
TOTAL
Fiscal Year 7/1/67
Abington
wm
11 Offices
22
Acton
23
-
-
-
-
23
Acushnet
-
13
-
-
-
13
Adams
1
-
—
9
" I
10
Agawam
-
—
-
73
73
Amesbury
3
—
7
-
10
Amherst
1
—
-
26
—
27
Andover
8
—
159
-
-
167
Arlington
308
—
17
-
-
325
Ashfield
-
-
0m%
—
6
6
Ashland
k
—
~
—
-
k
Athol
-
-
mm
1
-
1
Attleboro
50
72
—
—
-
122
Auburn
-
—
—
73
73
Avon
8
•M
mm
—
8
Ayer
61
3
10
2
76
Barnstable
3h
69
2
_
mm
105
Barre
1
—
—
-
33
' 3h
Bedford
52 i
—
3
-
-
tt
Belchertown
-
-
-
9
-
9
Bellingham
15
—
-
-
—
15
Belmont
22ir
—
12
—
-
"23H~
Beverly
60
-
1
-
—
61
Bill erica
29
—
10
—
39
Blacks tone
h
—
3
-
1 Bll
-
7
Blandford
-
-
—
1
-
1
Boston
12,U97
7
122
1
13
I2,61i0
Bourne
15
19
—
—
-
3U
B oxford
-
—
1
-
-
1
Boylston
-
Urn
—
—
7
7
Braintree
57
9-m
-
-
57
Brewster
-
3
mm
—
-
3
Bridgewater
2k
11 -
-
-
3b
Brisifield
-
mm
mm
10
-
1-
Brockton
238
31
17
M
-
288
Brookfield
-
*"
—
29
29
Brookline
1,023
-
10
-
-
1 ,033
Burlington
W "
-
—
-
-
U.
Cambridge
U7881
6
1
'I
1 ,795
Canton
78
—
—
„
—
"8
Carlisle
111
-
—
—
-
'k
Carver
15
-
-
—
-
'5
Charlton
m*
—
—
—
27
27
Chelmsford
6
—
9h
—
—
100
Chelsea
310
-
1
—
-
311
Chester
BOSTON
FALL
RIVER
LAWREKCE
SPRING-
. FIELD
5
WORCESTER
TOTAL
5
Chicopee
16
-
-
544
~
560
Clarksburg
-
-
—
3
-
3
Clinton
-
-
-
m
115
115
Cohasset
*
-
-
-
-
5
Concord
57
■»
1
-
m
5a
Dal ton
1
3
-—
U
Danvers
17
~
30
■tf
-
47
Dartmouth
14
99
—
-
-
113
Dedham
123
—
2
-
-
125
Deer field
2
-
-
2
—
4
Dennis
—
2
-
-
-
2
Dighton
m.
tl
-
-
-
It
Dracut
-
—
66
-
—
66
Dudley
5
-
-
-
75
80
©unstable
-
'»
i
-
-
1
Duxbury
10
—
-
-
-
10
East Bridgewater
59
.
. ,
mm
59
East Longmeadow
-
-
-
26
-
26^'
Easthampton
10
-
1
11
-
22
Easton
15
-
-
-
«•
15
Essex
h
-
..
-
k
Everett
398
-
3
-
3
404
Fair haven
10
132
tm
„.
1li2
Fall River
37
2,019
-
*«
-
2,056
Falmouth
36
—
-
-
-
36
Fitchburg
iti
-
-
cm
63
81"
Florida
3
-
-
-
-
3
Foxborough
11
-
-
-
-
11
Framingham
iai
-
2
-
13
196
Franklin
U2
-
-
-
-
42
Freetown
-
h
—
-
-
h
Gardner
22
M
M
61
83
<>©orgetown
10
-
>
h
-
ia
Gloucester
176
-
3
-
-
179
Grafton
-
-
-
-
91
91
Grahby
-
•»
—
11*
-
111
Great Barrington
I*
-
«•
1
•s
T~
Greenfield
26
-
-
6
p~
32
Groton
2
-
7
-
—
9
Groveland
19
-
1
-
•>
20
Hadley
mm
^
.
7
mm
7
Halifax
13
-
-
H
-
13
Hamilton
T"
-
-
-
tHft
4
Hampden
-
-
■M
5 ,
-
"T
TOTAL
Hanover
Hanson_
Hardwiek
Han-rich
Hatfield^
Haverhill
Hingham_
Holbrook
Holden_
Holliston
Holyoke
Hopedale
Hopkinton_
Hubbardston
Hudson
Hull_
Huntington
Ipswich
Kingston
Lakeville
Lancaster
Laxirrence
Lee
Leicester
Lenox^_
Leominster
Lexington
Lincoln^
Littleton_
Longmeadow
Lowell
Ludlow
Lynn
Lynnfield
Malden_
Manchester
Mansfield^
Marblehead
Karion^
Marlborough
Marshf ield
Mashpee
Mattapoisett
Maynard
Medfield
Medford
Medway
Melrose
BOSTON
16
FALL
RIVER
LAURENCE
SPRING-
FIELD
WORCESTER
TOTAL
U5
Iierriinac
-
-^.
18
~*
—
18
Methuen
9
—
387
- i
—
396
Hiddleborough
18
36
3
s
—
57
Mddleton
1
3
—
k
Milford
22
—
-
"*
111
133
Millbury
—
-
—
59
59
Millie
3
—
—
—
3
Milton
U2
—
—
~
—
U2
Monson
—
—
—
12
—
12
Montague
2
-
—
1
—
3
Nahant
6
_
6
Nantucket
1
3
—
—
—
U
Natick
1li0
-
h
—
1
115
Needham
71
2
—
73
New Bedford
~?3
1,211
-
—
—
1.261*
New Braintree
—
—
—
—
2
2
—
—
7
—
7
Nex-rburyport
-
—
3
~
—
3
Newton
%2
—
2
—
1
965
Norfolk
2
—
—
—
—
2
North Adams
20
—
-
8
1
29
North Andover
—
—
155
—
—
155
North Attleborough
10
2
—
—
—
12
North Brookfield
-
—
—
—
12
12
North Reading
26
—
—
—
-
26
Northampton
3
—
-
S3
1
57
Northborough
T
—
3
—
92
99
Northbridge
-
-
1
—
26
27
Norton
12
6
~
—
—
18
Norwell
"T
—
-
—
—
5
Nonfood
119
—
•
—
—
119
Orange
9
—
**
2
11
Orleans
h
—
—
—
-
*
Otis
4
I
—
—
—
j 1
Oxford
-
-
—
—
28
28
Palmer
h
23
27
Paxton
1
—
—
3h
S-
Peabody__
335
3k
—
—
369
Pembroke
3
—
-
—
-
3
Pepperell
—
—
12
—
-
12
Phillipston
22
_
—
—
—
22
Pittsfield
32
—
2
13
—
U7
Plainville
8
—
—
—
■to
8
Plymouth
19
—
—
—
—
19
Princeton
-
—
—
—
2
2
Provincetown
1
—
—
—
1
Quincy
201;
7
_
_
211
BOSTON
Randolph 61
FALL
RIVER
LATJRENCE
2
SPRING-
FIELD
WORCESTER
TOTAL
63
Raynham "TJ
k
-
—
8
Reading jj
-
-
s»
h it
Rehoboth -
1
-
„
-
1
Revere 113
-
2
-
—
115
Rochester -
3
-
-
—
3
Rockland So
3
-
-
—
63
Rowley 22
—
—
-
—
22
Royals ton - -
MB
T
. -
T
Rutland
-
-
-
32
32
Salem 92
1
93
Salisbury
—
1
—
-
1
Sandisfield
—
—
6
—
6""
Saugus 89
—
—
—
—
b9
Scituate 1 30
—
-.
—
«*
130
Seekonk 3
lit
—
—
-
17
Sharon 21
—
3
■■
—
2it
Sheffield I"
—
-
19
-
19
Sherborn I4.
—
—
-.
—
k
Shirley 1
—
—
—
-
1
Shrewsbury
—
—
-
187
187
Somerset
106
1
Cat
107
Somerville 91 1
—
-
-
1
912
South Hadley
—
—
50
50
Southborough 3
—
=
-
6
9
Southbridge
—
-
-
litl
litl
Southwick
~
—
6
—
6
Spencer 5
—
—
-
hi
U8
Springfield 23
<—
-
1,996
—
2,019
Stockbridge 3
-
1
~
it
Stoneham 1 02
—
—
Mi
—
102
Stoughton '69
12
—
—
—
81
Stow 1 1
—
—
—
-
11
Sturbridge
—
—
it
27
31
Sudbury 1 9
BS
M
—
2
21
Sutton
—
—
—
7
7
Swamps cott 77
—
—
—
—
77
Swansea -
72
—
-
—
72
Taunton 52
111
5
1
169
Templeton 1
-
—
—
1
2
Tewksbury 1 1
-
53
—
—
6U
Tisbury 1
-
—
—
—
1
Topsfield 32
—
7
—
—
39
Towns end
—
a
-
1
1
Truro 2
—
■1
—
—
2
Tyngsborough
~
—
—
—
1
Upton
.
£•
21
21
Uxbridge
-
-
-
36
36
Wakefield
BOSTON
U8
FALL
RIVER
LAWRENCE
12
SPRING-
FIELD
WORCESTER
TOTAL
60
Walpole
62
—
h
—
—
66
Walthain
h'3h
-
5
-
k39
Ware
—
-
-
6
23
29
Wareham
5 1
u
—
mm
-
9
Water town
506
-
—
*»
1
509
Wayland
20
-
tmt
2
22
Webster
2
-
—
«
171
173
Wellesley
109
—
—
—
109
Wellfleet
1
—
—
—
—
1
Wenham
h
—
—
—
-
k
West Boylston
-.
mm
—
-
56
56
VJest Bridgeuater
6
—
—
—
-
6
West Brookfield
-
—
—
2
9
11
West Springfield
1
—
—
131
-
132
Wes thorough
17
—
_
—
56
73
Westfield
-
—
•
11*7
-
1U7
Westford
2
—
h
—
—
6
Westminster
6
—
mm
—
-
6
Weston
35
—
—
1
" 36"
-
U8
—
—
-
hQ
Westwood
U2
—
6
—
mS
U8
Weymouth
105
«•
—
-
105
Whitrian
1
—
—
—
—
1
Wilbraham
-
—
—
1*9
—
U9
Williamsburg
-
-
1
—
1
Williamstown
-
«
-
1
-
1
Wilmington
37
—
6
—
-
U3
Winchendon
1
m
.
—
-
1
Winchester
78
—
6
—
m
8U
Winthrop
6Ii
—
m.
—
-
6U
Woburn
153
—
8
—
-
161
Worcester
51
—
7
«■*
3,373
3,U31
Wrentham
57
«.
—
-
57
Yarmouth
1
_,
1
Cut of State
h77
167
63
10
717
TOTAL
26,562
U.171
7,021 ,
3,937
i,606
U7,297
■
.
H ffavtBrr JffW-Tawfff
mMMm ■ B*
■ r, .* V ■ ■ ,-v I
\S m » ■
"■><:
H
■ rfl ■ "«^ ;
fin HI
^m ..
mm H
4 4 1 If*. 1 ,
1 1
■fl ■
H
!■
■
s*
:'"- :
J* \\ 4
[Xki*
Sra
■
1 1
■ V
■
i ■
■
i
H
•>'4V.'
■
' ' ' ■
nil
■ ■
TVNews
OpenLibrary